Each month GWBUSH.COM will feature a major donor to the Presidential
Exploratory Committee with an interview by one of the roving GWBUSH.COM staff.
This month we interviewed an important spokesperson for the corrections industry.
gwbush.com: Why do you give so much to political campaigns?
cs: Although we are a private corporation, all of our
income comes from federal and local governments. Our
corporate structure is technically the exact logical
opposite of a tax paying citizen. We are in the
business of locking people up. And since right now
governments are the only organizations with the power
to legally decide who gets locked up and how many
people are going to get locked up, we have to make
sure we have good communications with the governments.
gwbush.com: Do you find that giving to campaigns meets your business needs?
cs: We feel the current system of elections and
campaign financing is pretty clumsy and inefficient.
But it's the only one we got, so we make due. It is
bothersome that we can only give money to the
candidates before the election. In many other
countries it is much more logical: you are allowed to
give money to the leaders after the election and once
they are in office. That is often called a bribe. In
America there are sometimes two candidates who have a
plausible chance to win the election. In these cases,
we must give to both candidates. So that after the
election, we can be sure we will have paid the one
that wins. This means we have to spend a lot of money
on which we see no return ever.
gwbush.com: So you're not happy with the current system?
cs: Although we would favor reform to this system, it
has allowed us a tremendous amount of access so far.
Our industry helped to write the mandatory sentencing
laws that have been responsible for allowing
governments to lock up over 1.7 million of our
citizens--and plenty of other countries citizens too!
gwbush.com: Wow, that's a lot of people! Does your business model include
any other ways of making money off your prisoners? Selling advertising or providing
financial services?
cs: We do have one source of non-tax income as well. That is profit on prison
labor. Our prison labor industry is larger than Chinas, and we're working hard
to make sure they don't catch up. Companies such as TWA, Microsoft, and hundreds
of others produce huge amounts of goods in our prisons. This may sound like
slavery, as the prisoners get paid only pennies an hour and they really have
no choice about working. It sounds like slavery, and it is! One of the most
interesting little secrets about the constitution is that it has a special clause
on slavery in prisons.
gwbush.com: In this age of globalization are you branching out into other
markets?
cs: Frankly, even we were surprised by the number of
people the elected officials in the US were willing to
lock up. We don't think any other market would be as
favorable to our industry so we have remained
primarily domestic. The numbers have far surpassed
our wildest expectations. We'd also like to thank the
Left, the Labor Movement, and other social movements
and organizations for failing to organize effectively
against all this stuff.
gwbush.com: Are you worried about Amnesty 2000?
cs: Well, first we'd like to thank GWBUSH.COM for giving us this opportunity
tell the truth about why we participate in the political process, and how we
make so much money. And to answer your question: though we are worried about
Bush's populist Amnesty 2000 program, we are confident we will be able to talk
him out of it after the election.